- Reminder: Did you complete your Diet Journal today? Get it done!
- Did you do any physical activity? If not, make a point of it by tomorrow! Own a bike? Ride it to lunch, work, park, lake!
- It is our hope that our male fitness photos shall inspire you!
Today's Health - Wellness / Exercise / Reflections:Fighting back against bullyingBy Raju Woodward, Gazette-Times | Dec 13, 2010Sitting in chairs facing a crowd of about 40 people in the Corvallis High School Black Box Theatre on Sunday evening, four students shared their experiences dealing with discrimination.Chris Hands, a CHS senior who is gay, recalled changing into his P.E. clothes in a bathroom stall because he feared getting teased by other students.
The students also read experiences that were submitted by other CHS students and one teacher during the 35-minute presentation, "Stories of discrimination: The Anti-Bullying Project."
The free show was presented by CHS and Rainbow Health Resources, a nonprofit that promotes safe schools and sexual education in the Corvallis community. RHR board member Ajai Tripathi produced and directed the show.
"The important thing is that we wanted to get people to talk about bullying and discrimination," Tripathi said. "These shouldn't be taboo issues to talk about."
All the stories the students read dealt with harassment because of students' sexual orientation, but the students emphasized that any form of discrimination is wrong.
"Bullying is never okay," said senior Grace Murphy. "Nobody should go home feeling bad about who they are, regardless of how different they might be."
Murphy, who is straight, said her father and older brother are gay and that she wanted to participate in the presentation because she's frustrated by how people have treated her gay family members and friends.
After the presentation, the students participated in a brief question-and-answer session with audience members, which included CHS principal Dawn Granger.
The students offered suggestions about how to create a welcoming atmosphere for all students and how to get staff members more involved in talking about the issue of discrimination, especially regarding sexual orientation.
"When we hear words that shouldn't be tolerated, we need to tell a teacher," Murphy said. "We need to find teachers who we can talk about these issues and our feelings about them."
Today, the students will share the presentation with CHS students during "A" and "B" blocks and lunch period. Hands and Murphy said they are nervous about how their peers will react to the stories.
"It could go two ways, really fantastic or really bad," Hands said. "I'm optimistic that it will go fantastic. But I'd be lying if I said I wasn't a little nervous."
Consider joining:
- Members of Peckers Pics should join our President Barack Obama group . (Health Care, Gay Rights, Gay Marriage, Repeal DOMA & Don't Ask Don't Tell
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ObamaBiden2008/join - Bearhug Submission - Roommates (Wrestling fiction)(Your Yahoo Profile must have Age, Gender, Location before you apply for membership!). http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BearhugSubmission_/join
Take Action:
- Boycott advertisers of Glenn Beck on Fox News as well as all of FOX NEWS! Glenn has lied about Health-care, called our President a racist, and is anti-gay rights.
- We demand immediate end of DADT. It is out-right discrimination.
- Boycott Bill O'Reilly and FOX News and their advertisers. Bill discussed a French commercial by McDonalds that was meant to show that McDonalds is Gay Friendly. Bill said what is next? Is McDonalds going to get be Al-Qaida friendly as well? Further, Bill said that McDonalds would never show a gay friendly commercial in the USA. Imagine, Bill is comparing Gays to Al-Qaida!
- Boycott Arizona the home of senile - Sen. John McCain: because of their Hateful anti-Immigration Law that encourages racial profiling and increases hatred towards minorities. A remedy: Demand Republicans to support Immigration Reform. Further, Their Senator McCain voted against ending DADT and blocked Immigration reform! We shall hold the voters of Arizona responsible!
- NEW: Boycott Target and Best Buy for donating money towards anti-gay political candidates/organizations.
- NEW: Boycott Gold's Gym for donating loads of money to anti-gay candidates.
This group is called "Peckers PICS." The English - slang definition of "pecker" is to pluck at the truth. Therefore, we peck at items such as Gay Men's Health, Male Fitness, Gay (LGBT) Politics & Issues. In this section you may peck at each photo in order to decide the winner of the "war of the fittest!" Whereas, you should select the guy that may inspire you to exercise and "get fit!" Warning: This may stoke you!
Remember your participation in discussion of health / news articles - appearing in this message is greatly appreciated.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
7a
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20Paris, France; Gay Pride; June 27, 2010
Taipei, Taiwan; Gay Pride; Nov 5, 2010
12-14-10 / Sam Stein / Huffington PostWASHINGTON -- The decision by congressional Democrats to put forward a standalone repeal of the military's ban on openly gay servicemembers may pit President Barack Obama against Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) in a reprise of the 2008 presidential election rooted in procedural tactics and influence peddling.
On Tuesday, House lawmakers breathed life into a legislative vehicle pronounced dead on several occasions, announcing that they intended to split off a repeal of the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy from a larger defense authorization bill and pass the standalone bill along to the Senate. Where it goes from there will likely depend largely on which party and player applies the most pressure.
"I'd be surprised if it doesn't get out of the House. I never know what's going to happen over it the Senate," said Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wash.) in an interview on MSNBC. "Things have died over there that I thought ought to have passed, so I don't know, but it will get out of the House today."
In the Senate, there are currently myriad scenarios under which a standalone repeal could either pass or fail. But several sources -- both Republican and Democrat, on the Hill and off -- conveyed the sense that the bill's fate rests on two main questions: Whether McCain, who has spearheaded the opposition to repeal, will be able to delay or torpedo the measure through amendments, and whether Obama will dive into the trenches to help Senate Democratic leadership corral the votes for passage.
"I think we have a strong chance to change that policy before the end of the year," White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said Tuesday in a show of support for standalone repeal.
By virtue of procedural maneuvering, Senate Democrats may not need 60 votes to bring a DADT repeal standalone to the floor. The version passed by the House is known as a "message," which in turn is treated as a privileged matter by the Senate. That means lawmakers in the upper chamber can simply adopt it on their own convenience, though they will have a window for debate -- likely 30 hours -- and they will need to overcome a filibuster to end that debate and pass it into law.
A Republican Senate aide, however, disputed the idea that cloture would not be needed to start debate.
In a wide range of interviews with individuals working on Senate strategy, the path forward has begun to emerge. Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) will push to bring the bill to the floor sometime early next week, a Senate leadership aide said, ideally with legislation on tax cuts and the budget complete. Reid may have to fill the tree with amendments -- thereby setting in stone how the debate process plays out. But if he does this without accommodating Republican requests, it could give senators the cover they need to oppose the measure on procedural grounds.
More likely, Reid will grant the GOP a chance to air its proposed amendments and hope that they lack the support to stick. If one does pass, the bill would have to be sent back to the House, prolonging the repeal process or even threatening it, depending on the changes.
"Is it an ambitious strategy, yes," said Aubrey Sarvis, an Army veteran who serves as executive director of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network. "But it is a viable option, a realistic one."
If amendments are offered, Sarvis predicted that they would come from McCain. One would likely be a measure to effectively strike DADT repeal from consideration, as well as an amendment to expand the certification process for the law's repeal beyond the president, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen.
McCain, Sarvis said, "has indicated that there should be additional surveys and studies. We expect him to introduce these or any so-called apple pie amendments, all of them with design to stop the process in his tracks."
An email to a McCain spokesman asking which, if any, amendments the Senator might introduce was not returned. When The Huffington Post approached McCain on Tuesday to ask how he would vote on a standalone repeal bill, he replied, "It hasn't come up yet. I don't deal in hypotheticals."
Not all DADT repeal advocates view the Arizona Republican as a make-or-break player in the forthcoming debate. One high-ranking official at a pro-repeal organization called the McCain "yesterday's news."
"Don't get me wrong, he is still an opponent that should not be underestimated," the official added. "But, really, the game right now is to get this to the floor for consideration."
With respect to that task, the burden rests with Obama and, more largely, on Reid. The majority leader outlines the chamber's schedule and can control the bill's consideration relative to other priorities. However, a Democratic aide warned, Republicans have threatened to read all 1,924 pages of the Senate's omnibus-spending bill on the floor in an effort to run out the clock on other legislation. At that point, Reid's best and likeliest recourse would be to keep the Senate in session through the legislature's Christmas vacation.
Rep. John Larson (D-Conn.) told MSNBC Tuesday that Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.) claimed to have the 60 votes needed for passage. That seems dependent on keeping the Republican swing votes in the fold. And herein rests the President's role, aides and activists said.
If DADT repeal is to pass, Democrats will likely, but not necessarily, need three GOPers to cross party lines. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) appears to be a clear yes, having voted for a defense authorization bill carrying DADT repeal as well as cosponsoring Lieberman's standalone bill. Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Olympia Snowe (R-Maine), and Scott Brown (R-Mass.) are the other obvious targets. Pressure from the White House would go some way toward getting those members' support. But the president's influence may be felt much more directly inside his own party.
Only one Democratic senator, Joe Manchin of West Virginia, cast a vote last week against the defense authorization bill that carried "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" repeal. And while Hill aides are convinced that Manchin won't change his mind with respect to the policy, one Democrat close to the senator said it remains a possibility.
"I think the only one who could make the difference in this is the White House ... this is not a Senate game," the Democrat said. "This is really the dynamics and the strategy coming out of the White House ... and right now they are not out there lobbying this hard."
__._,_.___
No comments:
Post a Comment