Kashi is pretty good. I liked their protein bars and sometimes it'd be lunch time 11:30 before I knew I was hungry again after eating it like at say 9. Great one! I like eggs but I can't eat them everyday.
Next, Nick Ayler
And Hunter: DADT blocking repeal: He needs to give it up. I think he might try and put it as standalone legislation but he's probably considering putting in the form of a larger bill. Yet, my question is: Say it does pass? And he gets the people saying: People don't care, the repeal will not cause any harm to any military branch? Then what? I think it's a frivolous last ditch effort to hold up a dying policy
--- On Fri, 1/14/11, Jake <jakewest_tn@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Jake <jakewest_tn@yahoo.com>
Subject: [Peckers_Pics] Model Wars, PICS; Jan 15, 2011 - Safe PICS For All Ages, Rated G
To: Peckers_Pics@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, January 14, 2011, 7:40 PM
Model Wars, PICS; Jan 15, 2011
Safe PICS For All Ages, Rated G
Consider joining: Diet & Fitness: -
Reminder: Did you complete your Diet Journal today? -
Did you do any physical activity? If not, make a point of it by tomorrow! -
Perhaps our male fitness photos shall inspire you to get Fit! Health - Wellness - Exercise - Reflections: Resolution Kick-Start: Eat More Protein At Breakfast By James Beckerman, M.D./ January 13, 2011 Protein starts your day off right: It fills you up more than carbohydrates and makes you less likely to crave calories midmorning or to eat a larger lunch. Eggs are a great source of protein (and as the medical community's understanding of nutrition has evolved over the years, eggs are recommended again by cardiologists), but few people can eat them every day.
So we need to think outside the egg. There are plenty of other protein sources, including tofu, black beans, lean turkey and nuts - all of which are easy to incorporate into the most important meal of the day.
Protein-fortified breakfast cereals like Kashi GoLean are a great option for the traditionalist.
And don't forget about Greek yogurt, peanut butter and soy nut butter, which all have healthy protein levels.
Take Action: And Now, Model Wars! This group is called "Peckers Pics." The English - slang definition of "pecker" is to pluck at the truth. Therefore, we peck at items such as Gay Men's Health, Male Fitness, Gay (LGBT) Politics & Issues. In this section you may peck at each photo in order to decide the winner of the "war of the fittest!" Whereas, who is the model that may inspire you to exercise and "get fit?" Warning: This may stoke you! Your participation in discussion of health / news articles - appearing in this message is greatly appreciated.                                   Nick Ayler You Decide! Stonewall Street Festival on Wilton Drive in Wilton Manors, Fl (Fort Lauderdale); May 29, 2010 An opponent of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" repeal in the U.S. House intends to introduce legislation that would effectively block implementation of an end to the military's gay ban. Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.), an Iraq and Afghanistan war veteran and two-term House member, plans to introduce legislation that would expand the certification requirement for enacting "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" repeal. Under current law, which President Obama signed on Dec. 22, repeal would take effect 60 days after the president, the defense secretary and the chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff certify that the U.S. military is ready for open service. Hunter's proposed legislation would expand this certification responsibility to the military service chiefs: the chief of naval operations, the Marine Corps commandant, the Army chief of staff and the Air Force chief of staff. Joe Kasper, a Hunter spokesperson, said the expansion of certification is important because the service chiefs have an intimate knowledge of the military. "It's necessary that the service chiefs, who understand more than anyone else the unique challenges within their respective branches, are part of this process," Kasper said. Passage of the legislation would likely block repeal from happening because many service chiefs have testifed before Congress that they oppose "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" repeal at this time. Most prominent among them is Marine Corps Commandant Gen. James Amos, who in December told reporters that an end to the military's gay ban would cause a distraction that could "cost Marines' lives." Hunter has been among the most vocal opponents of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" repeal in the U.S. House. In December, he vehemently spoke out against ending the military's gay ban as the chamber debated a repeal measure. "It sounds good to make that comparison, that this is like the civil rights movement," Hunter said. "The problem is the United States military is not the YMCA . It's something special. And the reason that we have the greatest military in the world is because of the way that it is right now." During a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing in December, some service chiefs -- including Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey - testified that they didn't feel the need to have the responsibility of issuing certification for repeal because Defense Secretary Robert Gates would adequately represent their voice going forward. "I am very comfortable with my ability to provide input to Secretary Gates and to the Chairman that will be listened to and considered," Casey said. "So you could put it in there, but I don't think it's necessary." Casey added that he thinks an expansion of the certification requirement would undercut the Goldwater-Nichols Act of 1986, which set up the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff as the principal military adviser to the president. Kasper said the legislation is currently in draft form and Hunter hasn't yet made final plans on when it would be introduced. THE HILL newspaper, which first reported the news, quoted a congressional aide as saying the bill could be introduced as soon as Tuesday and that 15 to 20 Republicans have already signed on in support. Whether House Republican leadership would bring the legislation up to a vote on the floor is unknown. A spokesperson for U.S. House John Boehner (R-Ohio) didn't respond on short notice to a request to comment. In the Senate, where Democrats have retained control, it's unlikely the legislation would come up for a floor vote as a standalone bill. Still, the situation could be different if the House passed the measure as part of a larger moving vehicle -- such as an upcoming defense authorization bill. Aubrey Sarvis, executive director of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, said the announced plans to introduce the legislation aren't surprising, but are disappointing. "Let there be no doubt this is an attempted [plan] to placate a vocal minority and stir up discord before certification happens," he said. "Mr. Hunter's intent is to derail ['Don't Ask, Don't Tell'] repeal if he possibly can." Sarvis said he doesn't think the majority of members of the House want to disrupt repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" at this stage, and he knows that isn't the view of a majority of members of the Democratic-controlled Senate. "Congress, the most senior leadership in the Pentagon, and the American people have spoken on this issue," Sarvis said. "Mr. Hunter, like a few of his colleagues, is stuck in another era." 
|
No comments:
Post a Comment