Re: [Peckers_Pics] Banning Circumcision

By the way circumcision has been around in Jewish religion for about 3,700 years.  That included the descendants of Ishmael the father of the Arab nation which mostly is in the Moslem relgion among Arabs although the Christian Arabs may also still practise this tioo some degree although I do not know about  that for certain.

 

There has never been a Jewish mother that I have heard of that was worried about circumcision.

 

I do believe that all of this anti-circumcision stuff began with anti- Jewish racism

The Greeks tried to stop the Jews from practising circumcision

during their rule of Judah especially under Antiochus Epiphanes

I believe (that is when the revolt under the Mababees (high priest family) agains the Greeks took place and where the Hannukah holiday comes from.)

 

We are indeed going backwards here: re- freedom racism and the right of people to adhere to there ethnic/religious practices.

 

Respectfully,

Butch

---

From: Lee Sonoflaw <rumpldforeskin@yahoo.com>
To: Peckers_Pics@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, April 3, 2011 7:22:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Peckers_Pics] Banning Circumcision

 

Bacteria???  Give me a break.  99.9999% of bacteria are harmless and NECESSARY for a healthy life.  Very, very,VERY few bacteria cause any disease.  If you actually get rid of bacteria, YOU WILL DIE. 

Bacteria exists on every known surface on the earth.  Every surface in your body, every surface under the sea, and every surface under ice, every surface examined in volcanos, EVEY WHERE on earth.  If we kill of the good bacteria on your body, nature hates a vacuum.  Bad and dangerous bacteria will move in and take over and KILL you.

Smegma, that is the name , may smell bad, but is NOT dangerous to humans.  

--- On Sun, 4/3/11, stanley blanc <butch_blanc@yahoo.ca> wrote:

From: stanley blanc <butch_blanc@yahoo.ca>
Subject: Re: [Peckers_Pics] Banning Circumcision
To: Peckers_Pics@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, April 3, 2011, 1:23 PM

There are other infections and diseases that circumcision prevents or reduces.
 
This issue has more than a few medical views/opinions on it.
 
Also bacteria can hide in an uncircumsized foreskin and can be passed on to others or cause infection in the uncircumsized person himself.
 
Als, why are gays now going to a right-wing typical American
dictatorial method about doing something that parents should decide/
That is whether it is a decision for medical or religious reasons.
 
I am really getting fed up with hypocrisy.
Yes and I mean especially from Americans whether gay or straight.
Butch

From: medibolics_michael <michael@michaelmooney.net>
To: Peckers_Pics@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, April 2, 2011 11:55:10 PM
Subject: [Peckers_Pics] Banning Circumcision

 

OK guys, I researched this issue thoroughly and it turns out that circumcision DOES NOT reduce chances of HIV or STD infection. In fact, it increases them because foreskin produces immune factors like lysozymes that kill HIV and various invading organisms.

Additionally, uncircumcised guys are about four times more sensitive than circumcised because circumcision removes the most sensitive parts of the organ and over 20,000 nerve ending.

Lloyd Shofeld is putting banning circumcision on the ballot in San Francisco. I am proposing we echo his bill in West Hollywood. Stop mutilating baby boys!

To read the full story see:http://wehonews.com/z/wehonews/archive/page.php?articleID=5792.

This article is fully referenced from the published medical literature. This is not someone's opinion. I formed my opinion after reading several dozen studies.

Michael Mooney
www.michaelmooney.net
www.medibolics.com

Moderator: Thanks Michael. I notice you change on this from time to time. Michael, you know that many of your opinions i research and formed new opinion and even Amer. Mewdical Assoc has taken a different stance that agrees with you, etc. Some items have nopt been agreed to. Yes i know about corruption, etc.... However, i have read huge studies that show different opinions on circumcision. 1st of all, countries and ethnic that lead in HIV ingection, are usually un-circumcised.

However, I believe that some have a genetic make up that prevents infection (immunity). That is why so many guys in a long term relationship have found 1 of the 2 infected. So mnay of these cases demonstrate that these are couples who had 1 of 2 partners unknowingly carrying HIV for 1 or more decades, while the other partner, never tested positive. i
have read hundreds, perhaps thousands of explanations.

Personally, if i had a new born son, i would not have him circumsized as it is painful, trumatic, etc.... to the infact. However, i repect religious consideration, etc.... I am not making blanket statement of what one should do.

....jake

__._,_.___

All members of "Peckers PICS" are requested to join our "Obama Biden 2008" group as it runs in conjunction to this group.  Both groups shall not repeat articles from one group to another.  However, to gain full knowledge of Gay rights, members must belong to the Obama group as well as this group.  Therefore, please accept your invitation to join. 

To join the Obama group please click (or copy and paste the link into your browser) @  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ObamaBiden2008/join

Thank you!
 

�Every gay and lesbian person who has been lucky enough to survive the turmoil of growing up is a survivor. Survivors always have an obligation to those who will face the same challenges.�

...Jake (Moderator)

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___