From: stanley blanc <butch_blanc@yahoo.ca>
To: Peckers_Pics@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, April 3, 2011 11:33:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Peckers_Pics] Banning Circumcision
From: medibolics_michael <michael@michaelmooney.net>
To: Peckers_Pics@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, April 2, 2011 11:55:10 PM
Subject: [Peckers_Pics] Banning Circumcision
OK guys, I researched this issue thoroughly and it turns out that circumcision DOES NOT reduce chances of HIV or STD infection. In fact, it increases them because foreskin produces immune factors like lysozymes that kill HIV and various invading organisms.
Additionally, uncircumcised guys are about four times more sensitive than circumcised because circumcision removes the most sensitive parts of the organ and over 20,000 nerve ending.
Lloyd Shofeld is putting banning circumcision on the ballot in San Francisco. I am proposing we echo his bill in West Hollywood. Stop mutilating baby boys!
To read the full story see:http://wehonews.com/z/wehonews/archive/page.php?articleID=5792.
This article is fully referenced from the published medical literature. This is not someone's opinion. I formed my opinion after reading several dozen studies.
Michael Mooney
www.michaelmooney.net
www.medibolics.com
Moderator: Thanks Michael. I notice you change on this from time to time. Michael, you know that many of your opinions i research and formed new opinion and even Amer. Mewdical Assoc has taken a different stance that agrees with you, etc. Some items have nopt been agreed to. Yes i know about corruption, etc.... However, i have read huge studies that show different opinions on circumcision. 1st of all, countries and ethnic that lead in HIV ingection, are usually un-circumcised.
However, I believe that some have a genetic make up that prevents infection (immunity). That is why so many guys in a long term relationship have found 1 of the 2 infected. So mnay of these cases demonstrate that these are couples who had 1 of 2 partners unknowingly carrying HIV for 1 or more decades, while the other partner, never tested positive. i have read hundreds, perhaps thousands of explanations.
Personally, if i had a new born son, i would not have him circumsized as it is painful, trumatic, etc.... to the infact. However, i repect religious consideration, etc.... I am not making blanket statement of what one should do.
....jake
__._,_.___
No comments:
Post a Comment