Re: [Peckers_Pics] Banning Circumcision

Banning? Ridiculous.  There are male infants with conditions that require circumcision.  Do we let the fanatics who vote for banning also decide whether a medically necessary circumcision is allowed?  Will Jews and Muslims require proof from their rabbis or imams that the child is indeed Jewish or Muslim?   Someone should suggest that people with hemmorhoids be required to have them fixed so that anal sex will be more comfortable -- and avoid bleeding. --- On Sun, 4/3/11, medibolics_michael <michael@michaelmooney.net> wrote: From: medibolics_michael <michael@michaelmooney.net> Subject: [Peckers_Pics] Banning Circumcision To: Peckers_Pics@yahoogroups.com Date: Sunday, April 3, 2011, 3:55 AM   OK guys, I researched this issue thoroughly and it turns out that circumcision DOES NOT reduce chances of HIV or STD infection. In fact, it increases them because foreskin produces immune factors like lysozymes that kill HIV and various invading organisms. Additionally, uncircumcised guys are about four times more sensitive than circumcised because circumcision removes the most sensitive parts of the organ and over 20,000 nerve ending. Lloyd Shofeld is putting banning circumcision on the ballot in San Francisco. I am proposing we echo his bill in West Hollywood. Stop mutilating baby boys! To read the full story see:http://wehonews.com/z/wehonews/archive/page.php?articleID=5792. This article is fully referenced from the published medical literature. This is not someone's opinion. I formed my opinion after reading several dozen studies. Michael Mooney www.michaelmooney.net www.medibolics.com Moderator: Thanks Michael. I notice you change on this from time to time. Michael, you know that many of your opinions i research and formed new opinion and even Amer. Mewdical Assoc has taken a different stance that agrees with you, etc. Some items have nopt been agreed to. Yes i know about corruption, etc.... However, i have read huge studies that show different opinions on circumcision. 1st of all, countries and ethnic that lead in HIV ingection, are usually un-circumcised. However, I believe that some have a genetic make up that prevents infection (immunity). That is why so many guys in a long term relationship have found 1 of the 2 infected. So mnay of these cases demonstrate that these are couples who had 1 of 2 partners unknowingly carrying HIV for 1 or more decades, while the other partner, never tested positive. i have read hundreds, perhaps thousands of explanations. Personally, if i had a new born son, i would not have him circumsized as it is painful, trumatic, etc.... to the infact. However, i repect religious consideration, etc.... I am not making blanket statement of what one should do. ....jake

__._,_.___

All members of "Peckers PICS" are requested to join our "Obama Biden 2008" group as it runs in conjunction to this group.  Both groups shall not repeat articles from one group to another.  However, to gain full knowledge of Gay rights, members must belong to the Obama group as well as this group.  Therefore, please accept your invitation to join. 

To join the Obama group please click (or copy and paste the link into your browser) @  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ObamaBiden2008/join

Thank you!
 

�Every gay and lesbian person who has been lucky enough to survive the turmoil of growing up is a survivor. Survivors always have an obligation to those who will face the same challenges.�

...Jake (Moderator)

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___